179 | 1 | 181 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的 分析营养风险筛查2002量表(NRS2002)结合加速康复外科理念-多学科协同诊疗(ERAS-MDT)模式的护理干预对肝切除患者术后营养指标及视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分的影响。方法 将2021年10月至2022年10月接收的320例肝切除患者纳入研究,随机分为试验组与参照组,每组160例。参照组给予普通护理干预,试验组给予NRS2002结合ERAS-MDT模式的护理干预,对比两组术后第1天、术后第3天、出院日的营养指标(血清转铁蛋白、白蛋白、前白蛋白)水平、VAS评分、不良反应发生率与护理满意率。结果 术后第1天,两组患者的营养指标水平、VAS评分无统计学意义(P> 0.05);术后第3天、出院日,两组患者的营养指标水平均提高,试验组高于参照组(P <0.05),两组患者的VAS评分均下降,试验组低于参照组(P <0.05);试验组的不良反应发生率低于参照组,护理总满意率高于参照组(P <0.05)。结论 NRS2002结合ERAS-MDT模式的护理干预对肝切除患者术后营养指标及VAS评分有积极影响,一方面可显著改善患者的营养状态,另一方面可减轻疼痛,从而促进身体恢复。
Abstract:Objective To analyze the effects of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 Scale(NRS2002) combined with accelerated rehabilitation surgery concept and multidisciplinary collaborative treatment(ERAS-MDT) model on postoperative nutritional indexes and visual analog scale(VAS) scores in patients with hepatectomy. Methods A total of 320 hepatectomy patients received from October 2021 to October 2022 were included in the study and randomly divided into experimental group and reference group, with 160 cases in each group. The reference group was given general nursing intervention, and the experimental group was given NRS2002 combined with ERAS-MDT mode of nursing intervention. The levels of nutritional indexes(serum transferrin, albumin and prealbumin), VAS score, adverse reaction incidence rate and nursing satisfaction rate of the two groups were compared on the first day after surgery, the third day after surgery and the day of discharge. Results On the first day after surgery, there was no statistical significance in the level of nutritional indexes and VAS scores between the two groups(P>0.05). On the third day after surgery and on the day of discharge, the nutritional indexes of both groups were increased, the experimental group was higher than the reference group(P<0.05),the VAS scores of both groups were decreased, and the experimental group was lower than the reference group(P<0.05). The adverse reaction incidence rate of the experimental group was lower than that of the reference group, and the nursing satisfaction rate was higher than that of the reference group(P<0.05). Conclusions Nursing intervention of NRS2002 combined with ERAS-MDT model had positive effects on postoperative nutritional indexes and VAS scores of patients with hepatectomy, which significantly improved nutritional status on the one hand and alleviated pain on the other hand, thus promoting physical recovery.
[1]王敏,汤佳媚,徐英.肝切除术患者围手术期营养管理的最佳证据总结[J].中华现代护理杂志,2022,28(28):3895-3900.
[2]魏燕,潘文佳,宫睿. MUST量表与NRS2002量表在肺炎支原体肺炎患儿中的应用比较[J].中国医学创新,2021,18(13):122-126.
[3]高红芹,樊华,戴方园. 1例肝切除术后胆汁大量外渗合并伤口愈合不良患者的伤口护理[J].中国临床护理,2022,14(3):196-198.
[4]招坤兰,苏雪梅,丁艺新,等. NRS 2002和PG-SGA量表在中老年脑卒中患者营养筛查中的应用[J].广东医科大学学报,2022,40(2):202-204.
[5]邢胜男,高园,邢季伟.运用营养风险筛查2002指导护理干预在腹部手术患者中的应用[J].当代医学,2022,28(15):168-172.
[6]祝芸,张淑丹. PG-SGA与NRS2002评估筛查下营养支持方案改良促进老年急性胰腺炎临床预后效果分析[J].当代护士(下旬刊),2022,29(2):58-61.
[7]金铨,赵江生,禹亚彬,等.加速康复外科理念对老年腹腔镜肝癌切除患者术后营养及谵妄的影响[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2021,24(12):935-938.
[8]邓小凤,张英,杨凤霞,等.原发性肝癌患者肝切除术前营养风险筛查及营养支持对营养风险患者康复效果的对照研究[J].现代生物医学进展,2022,22(15):2860-2864,2845.
[9]李云霞,王海燕,李燕爽. ERAS-MDT模式在结肠癌合并肠梗阻围术期的应用[J].临床医学工程,2022,29(8):1121-1122.
[10]周慧,黄玄玄,汤亚媛,等.加速康复外科理念的序贯口服营养支持在老年肝切除患者围术期的应用[J].当代护士(下旬刊),2021,28(8):51-53.
基本信息:
DOI:10.15912/j.issn.1671-8194.2024.30.015
中图分类号:R473.6
引用信息:
[1]黄秀环.NRS2002量表结合ERAS-MDT模式的护理对肝切除患者术后恢复影响[J].中国医药指南,2024,22(30):52-55.DOI:10.15912/j.issn.1671-8194.2024.30.015.
基金信息: